Archive for the do the right thing Category

pastebin sux

Posted in blogosphere, censorship, do the right thing, politics with tags , , , , , , on October 13, 2013 by Qritiq

 

pastebin leaves social security numbers and defamatory crap up…

 

but takes this down:

 

 

Vince in the Bay: My Leniency Letter to Judge Preska.

 

 

wtf?????????


Advertisements

Level Up

Posted in Chagall, do the right thing, evil, politics, victory, visions with tags , , , on September 20, 2013 by Qritiq




I saw the righteous rise from their graves.

There was thick shimmering heat from all the fire but it didn’t bother them; they were made of grey stone.







Admitted Liar

Posted in do the right thing, Doh!, illegal, politics, reality check, sockypuppets, tacky with tags on March 23, 2013 by Qritiq





liar



Top Commenters Of 2012

Posted in blogosphere, do the right thing, Doh!, mental, politics, reality check, sockypuppets, spin with tags , , , on January 14, 2013 by Qritiq




As shown below in the WordPress 2012 report for the qritiq blog, Dustin Farahnak was the 4th most active commenter at the qritiq blog in 2012. He also commented here in 2011. Click on the image for a clearer view:


Dustin Farahnak Lies

From 2012 qritiq blog WordPress report



Yet these are his claims:


This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 


Well, I hope he doesn’t hope to pursue any careers that would demand logic and/or ethical behavior.








SuppliesOutlet – Save up to 70% Using Compatible Printer Ink Cartridges








“Positive feedback 0%”

Posted in blogosphere, crime, do the right thing, Doh! with tags , , , , on October 7, 2012 by Qritiq

.


.

.

.

.

.

.



conspirators rico fraud intimidation Andrew Breitbart ebay scammers Douglas Stewart CT ebay scammer Douglas Stewart Connecticut ebay scam Sean Tompkins San Antonio ebay scammer Sean Tompkins San Diego Dustin Farahnak libeler liar John Patrick Frey TX Patterico Patrick Frey troll Dustin Farahnak defamer paid troll Dust92 liar Dustin Farahnak Texas Dustin Farahnak Austin area Brandon Darby Austin Brandon Darby Sean Tompkins San Antonio Sean Tompkins doch210 docholiday187 guttamane187 Douglas Stewart Douglas M. Stewart guttamane187 docholiday187 CT Patrick Frey TX Lee Stranahan San Antonio Brandon Darby Austin Lee Stranahan Sean Tompkins San Antonio Dustin Farahnak conspiracy Douglas Matthew Stewart co-conspirator felony Douglas Stewart ex-con Douglas Stewart heroin addict CT

“SECRET EVIDENCE”

Posted in audio, censorship, crime, do the right thing, politics, spin with tags , , , , , , , , , , , on June 4, 2012 by Qritiq

.

Patrick Frey, an L.A. Deputy District Attorney, aka the blogger and James O’Keefe supporter Patterico, posted a document produced by one Kent Gibson, who also works with the L.A. courts (presumably an acquaintance, colleague, or friend of Frey’s.) Gibson describes himself as a “Certified Audio & Video Forensic Examiner”.

Based on a test that Gibson refers to as “the gold standard” of voice identification, Gibson determined that:

“Frey Swat [911 tape of caller that perpetrated a crime] and Brynaert Known [a recording from an interview show of Ron Brynaert, former Executive Editor of a political website] cannot be shown to be the same speaker”.

.

There were a lot of other words in this document about results of methods that Gibson indicates are not nearly as  reliable or accurate (if at all) as the test Gibson says is the “gold standard”, which he used to conclude the statement above.  There were also lots of words included in the document, which described opinion rather than statements of fact.)

.

oh, and i’d like to ask y’all a personal question:

Suppose you log on, and you see that a Deputy District Attorney asked someone (presumably a friend of his) described as a “Certified Audio & Video Forensic Examiner” for the courts, to compare a sample of your voice (found on the internet) to a criminal’s, (in order to try to come up with some basis, that sounds official, to make people think that you ARE the criminal), and this D.A. publishes the resultant document, that his friend wrote up, on his blog.

You see that this posted document says your voice was used in the comparison, because you are “suspected of being the Swat caller re: Frey”. And the “Certified Audio & Video Forensic Examiner” says his opinion is that you are a criminal based on a “totality” of stuff (though we’re not privy to know exactly what that stuff may be.)  He writes this opinion even though the results of the test, that he himself says is the gold standard of testing, indicated that you “cannot be shown to be” the criminal.

The D.A.’s  readers see this document; some of them blog about it, tweet it, and get more people to do the same…, and so on, and so on. And as a result, a lot of your former colleagues, people you correspond with online, friends and acquaintances, and anyone else who happens to search on your name, can see that you are being examined by Los Angeles officials because you are “suspected of being” a criminal.  (And needless to say, you’re not a criminal, you’ve done nothing at all wrong – and you’ve never been convicted of a crime.)

So how would you feel about that?

And what would you think the proper remedy would be?

.

.

Downright Dirty

Posted in audio, censorship, crime, do the right thing, illegal, mental, politics, spin with tags , , , , , , on June 2, 2012 by Qritiq

.

.

.

.

the upshot:

.

-Judge refuses to rule on Battle of Thessalonica

-Judge has a LOT of years on the bench; sure doesn’t know much about the internet, but knows about people and their probable future actions based on what he’s seen go down in the past.

-Judge rules Aaron may not contact Kimberlin by megaphone (or any other means.)

-Judge says Aaron is inciting death threats and threats against children.

-Judge finds Aaron is doing a “downright dirty” thing.

.

.

Believe me I’m no lawyer, but I have heard that there is a difference between the letter of the law and the intent of the law, and judges consider the intent of the law in their rulings. If you listen, you’ll see that since he is ruling on a protective peace order, (a pretty common thing), the judge’s primary concern is keeping both of these guys safe, not the intricacies of constitutional law as it relates to electronic communications, conspiracy,  death threats across state lines, incitement to commit violent acts, etc., etc.