Highly Scandalous

Q: Who knew of AW’s online dalliances?

A: AW, Broussard, Nobles, Casino Worker, Ginger Lee, ladies #5 and #6, Huma

Q: What circle does Huma commiserate with? Perhaps her work friends?

Q: Who ran the HRC ’08 campaign who also happens to be AW’s foremost competition?

Q: Who did that guy hire who had worked for Pepsi?

Jimmy Siegel

.

Q: Who also worked for Pepsi, used social media to promote HRC’s ’08 campaign (h/t @ronbryn),  and has written more words online than anyone else about Weinergate?

.

Like this on Facebook

Advertisements

8 Responses to “Highly Scandalous”

  1. Can you back any of that up with hyperlinks?

    And what’s the name of that guy?

    BTW, I don’t think Ron is much of a source. He threatens to sue his mildest critics.

    But I do think this is a very interesting and plausible explanation for some aspects of this story, especially why someone would want to publicize Weiner’s misbehavior and yet be aligned contrary to Breitbart later.

  2. BTW, if it’s just obvious to some people who that guy is, just understand some of us don’t get news from TV so we might miss these references. Really, it would help if you names that dude.

    If you are worried about defaming him, just say ‘this is a possible explanation’ or ‘this is my theory’.

  3. Q: Who knew of AW’s online dalliances?

    I’d leave GC out of that list — unclear what she knew.

    And obviously I’d add Dan Wolfe / Nikki Reid / JG in.

    • True – but I am taking what I think is an educated guess on GC. It was not Weiner’s MO to send pics to gals that he didn’t already have a flirtation going with. (However, I would really be shocked if it turned out to be GC that spread that info.) annd I guess I’m still thinking (as I think you also had been at one time at least) that #6 is or is connected with DW/The Reids/JG.

    • and to try to be a bit clearer (oy), I’m trying to draw a map indicating how ( if Nikki Reid is not #6) the info about AW’s online activities could have been distributed to “her”.

      • Hey, why didn’t you answer me?

        Anyway, you say this person is “Jimmy Seigel”. Interesting theory.

    • I’ve decided Lee was more right about GC here than I was, so I’ve updated the post accordingly.

  4. oh, btw – the reason this post is “buried” by being back-dated a year, is because it is not of general interest to the public and would not make any sense to people.

Leave a Qomment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s